In crypto, where prices change every second and liquidity determines the viability of a project, market making is far from just a technical function; it is a full-fledged strategic tool.
In particular, one of the key market making strategies for crypto projects is arbitrage, which helps increase market depth, reduce spreads, and activate traders.
At the same time, it opens up special opportunities for arbitrageurs: they use the price difference between exchanges or trading pairs to generate stable income while supporting the market.
Market making is becoming profitable for a reason — special programs on crypto platforms play a key role here. They create favorable conditions not only for exchanges or projects, but also for arbitrageurs themselves.
Such programs often provide reduced or even zero trading commissions for those who provide liquidity. As a result, arbitrageurs can carry out hundreds of transactions without significant commission costs — this is especially important for strategies with small but frequent profits.
Another bonus is the developed market-making infrastructure with low latency. For arbitrageurs, this means literally ‘playing in milliseconds’: accessing the most favorable prices in real time and instantly locking in profits while the spread is still relevant.
In essence, market making acts as a catalyst for efficiency: it reduces trading costs, accelerates capital turnover, and makes the market more stable. As a result, everyone wins — traders get stable conditions for arbitrage, exchanges increase trading volumes, and the market as a whole becomes deeper and more predictable.
Recently, I decided to check how profitable arbitrage can be for traders in market maker programs on different exchanges. First, I analyzed the terms and conditions of programs on leading platforms and compiled my own conditional rating.
Taking into account the conditions and additional tools for comparing potential income, I settled on the top two exchanges — Bybit and WhiteBIT.
For the case study, I took two hypothetical market makers: trader A on WhiteBIT and trader B on Bybit, with a trading volume of $5 million per month on the BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT pairs. The strategy is simple: buy on one exchange and sell on another, taking advantage of the price difference.
So, according to my rough calculations, a trader can earn about 0.25% of the arbitrage volume, excluding commissions, or $12,500 per month. Adding WhiteBIT's rebate of approximately $600, the net result can be around $13,100 per month.
At the same time, based on the same hypothetical profit of $12,500 without fees and adding an average Bybit’s commission rebate of around $250, the net profit could be approximately $12,750 per month.
Based on these calculations, WhiteBIT has a slight advantage due to rebates and bonuses for fast order execution, while Bybit offers greater flexibility and the ability to integrate with projects that require liquidity.
So, if you're planning to get into arbitrage, it's important to look at not just fees, but also order execution speed, API quality, and extra bonuses from market maker programs.
Picking the right exchange and program can make your arbitrage strategy consistently profitable, even with moderate trading volumes. Here are some key factors to consider when choosing a platform.
API Integration and Quality.
Technical compatibility is crucial for market makers. An exchange with a reliable API, fast access to real-time data, and minimal delays in order execution will ensure the effectiveness of your strategies.
On-Chain Media articles are for educational purposes only. We strive to provide accurate and timely information. This information should not be construed as financial advice or an endorsement of any particular cryptocurrency, project, or service. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile and unpredictable.Before making any investment decisions, you are strongly encouraged to conduct your own independent research and due diligence
Tags :
0 Comments
Show More
StableStock is solving one of the biggest frictions in tokenized equities—access and distribution.
Learn why Wallet-as-a-Service solutions offer superior speed, compliance, and cost savings compared to developing crypto wallets in-house.
The real edge comes from joining market maker programs — where fees drop to zero and every millisecond counts.
On-Chain Media is an independent, reader-funded crypto media platform. Kindly consider supporting us with a donation.
bc1qp0a8vw82cs508agere759ant6xqhcfgcjpyghk
0x18d7C63AAD2679CFb0cfE1d104B7f6Ed00A3A050
CBaXXVX7bdAouqg3PciE4HjUXAhsrnFBHQ2dLcNz5hrM
Contains the last 12 releases