In a quiet government office nearly a decade ago, an agent from Homeland Security reportedly sat across from not one but four individuals. Their names, still redacted in official documents, may hold the answer to the greatest mystery in modern finance: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?
According to a resurfaced interview with Ronat Saud, assistant special agent with Homeland Security Investigations, U.S. agents flew to California to meet the elusive creator of Bitcoin. But what they found was startling. Satoshi wasn’t a person. Satoshi was a team. Four minds. One pseudonym. And possibly–one hidden agenda.
The theory that’s now gaining momentum is as bold as it is blasphemous: Bitcoin was never the endgame. It was the prototype—the beta test. The real technology–sleek, compliant, and lightning fast–was always meant to be XRP and its twin, XLM.
Dig into the early architecture of crypto, and you’ll find some eerily overlapping fingerprints.
· David Schwartz– Ripple’s CTO, filed a patent for distributed processing in 1988, describing what amounts to a blueprint for blockchain, decades before Bitcoin emerged.
· Arthur Britto– the reclusive co-founder of Ripple, helped write the XRP Ledger and has all but vanished from public life.
· Jed McCaleb– Builder of Mt. Gox and co-founder of both Ripple and Steller (XLM), silently cashed out billions in XRP–but has never been named in any legal proceedings.
· The fourth figure remains speculative–possibly Ryan Fugger, who created RipplePay.com in 2004, or an undisclosed government-linked technologist.
Together, these individuals may not just be Ripple pioneers. They may be the original Satoshi team.
Now, here’s where things get strange.
Domain records show that as early as 2005, websites like bitcoins.com, opencoin.com, ripplepay.com, and ripple.com all shared the same IP address–an address allegedly tied to a Pentagon-controlled block.
This was four years before Bitcoin was publicly released. How do you explain Bitcoin’s ideological anti-government stance being born from a government-linked server?
You don’t. Unless the very premise was a decoy.
Back in 2020, Tiffany Hayden, a known voice in the XRP community, ignited speculation when she commented on Twitter that:
“The same people who created Bitcoin also created XRP.”
This claim surfaced in a screenshot shared by @XRPMyrtleBeach, quoting a conversation where someone remarked, “So Joel Katz [David Schwartz] created Bitcoin,” to which Hayden replied:
“Ask Jed.”
Her statement left little room for ambiguity and suggested that Jed McCaleb–a co-founder of both Ripple and Stellar–might have had a role in the creation of Bitcoin itself.
If XRP and Bitcoin share not just DNA–but parents–then the implications are seismic. XRP isn’t just Bitcoin’s competitor. It might be Bitcoin’s intended successor.
Let’s talk functionality. Bitcoin takes minutes to settle a transaction, while XRP takes seconds. Bitcoin burns energy like a furnace, while XRP does not. Bitcoin is a monument to decentralization, but it’s also clunky, expensive, and slow. XRP was designed to be better. And it is.
That’s not conjecture. That’s why major banks and governments are quietly exploring XRP for cross-border settlements. It’s ISO 20022-compliant. It plugs into legacy systems. It was, arguably, built for this moment.
Even Ripple’s own blog in 2014 stated:
“Bitcoin is not about one man or one company. It is a grand experiment, a glimpse of tomorrow.”
An experiment. There’s that word again.
If XRP had been created to revolutionize institutional finance, then XLM (Stellar) would have been its mirror–built for the people. Also co-founded by Jed McCaleb, XLM runs on a similar consensus mechanism and shares XRP’s speed and compliance advantages. But while Ripple focused on banks, Stellar focused on remittances and unbanked populations.
This wasn’t a feud. It was a fork in mission.
Two sides of the same coin–XRP for top-down finance, XLM for grassroots movement. Covering both attack vectors for global adoption.
Some in the XRP community have long suspected that the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple was never about investor protection–it was a distraction.
While Ripple executives faced years of legal uncertainty, Jed McCaleb, co-creator of both XRP and Stellar, was allowed to offload billions of XRP with zero legal interference quietly. Why? If McCaleb was one of the original Satoshi’s–or part of the broader digital currency rollout–his exemption may not have been accidental. It may have been strategic.
The Ripple case may have served as controlled opposition–something to delay XRP’s rise while regulators aligned infrastructure behind the scenes. Because once the case ends and the dust settles, the stage will be set for XRP to go fully global.
So if the U.S. government knew Satoshi’s identity, and if XRP and XLM were their refined tools, why the silence? Why sue Ripple but ignore McCaleb’s XRP sales? Why allow Jed to walk free while Garlinghouse stands trial? Simple. Control the narrative, test the waters, obscure the origins.
Bitcoin was the story. XRP and XLM are the solution.
Here’s a detail most mainstream headlines overlook: both XRP and XLM are ISO 20022-compliant. That’s not just alphabet soup. ISO 20022 is the messaging standard that will govern the future of global financial transactions, from SWIFT transfers to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). It’s almost as if the architecture was pre-approved.
As banks and governments shift to this new protocol through 2025 and beyond, assets that speak the language of ISO 20022 will have the highest utility–and possibly, the highest demand. In that world, Bitcoin looks more like a relic than a revolution.
In April 2025, a reporter released a book titled The Mysterious Mr. Nakamoto, confirming through FOIA-backed sources that Homeland Security agents met four individuals they believed created Bitcoin. The book aligns with metadata, IP logs, patents, and internal Ripple documents.
And yet, mainstream media remains silent. The crypto community is split. But those watching closely–those reading the code, and tracing the breadcrumbs-are starting to understand:
Bitcoin was never the future. It was the invitation. XRP and XLM are the arrival.
If this theory holds–and the government truly helped build and conceal Bitcoin’s origins–then everything changes. Bitcoin was never the revolution. It was the spark. XRP and XLM? They might just be the fire. And perhaps the biggest twist of all? We were never supposed to find out.
On-Chain Media articles are for educational purposes only. We strive to provide accurate and timely information. This information should not be construed as financial advice or an endorsement of any particular cryptocurrency, project, or service. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile and unpredictable.Before making any investment decisions, you are strongly encouraged to conduct your own independent research and due diligence
Tags :
0 Comments
Show More
This article delves into real-world business cases and institutional strategies for crypto lending, highlighting platforms like Arcus BTC and WhiteBIT.
Know the top security essentials in crypto trading bot development to protect digital assets, secure APIs, and ensure safe, automated trading.
Seraph, the dark fantasy Web3 ARPG, claims the number 1 spot on BNB Chain's DappBay with over 1.1 million users and a $1.6 million airdrop after its Binance Alpha debut.
Contains the last 12 releases
